Categories

Pro Report – Roger Cicala and with 40mm f/0.85 Ibelux

Pro-Report---Roger-Cicala-aIF Roger Cicala said a Lens is good then that yes it will be a good lens no doubt… moving forward to his conslusion

Let’s face it, everyone. Right in the center, even at f/0.85, the Ibelux 40mm is as good as, or a bit better than, the Canon 50mm f/1.2. Stopped down to f/1.4 (there’s no f/1.2 click on the Ibelux) it’s clearly better in the center. Away from center, the Canon is clearly better. This is an amazing optical performance, though, and for an f/0.85 lens, simply amazing. In my expectations at the beginning of this article, I never expected this lens to do this well in the center. I didn’t even consider it a possibility.
So maybe now I know why they charge what they charge for it. This is a unique bit of glass. Okay, it’s not a “bit,” it’s a huge chunk of glass. My negative expectations have been completely discounted by a little objective testing. It’s built better than I expected. It’s optically better than I expected. It has far less variation than I expected. My hat is off to the designers at IB/E Optics and the manufacturers at Shanghai Transvision. Very nicely played, gentleman. Very nicely played, indeed.
I can’t tell you that it’s worth $2,000 to you, but I can certainly say it’s not overpriced for what it offers. This is an excellent lens.

The lens costs a bit over $2,000 in US at BHphoto.

 

Leave a Reply

Top-5-Photo-contest-image
camera-comparison-dtatbase best-pro-compact-camer-imagbest-entry-level-dslr-imageBest-APS-C-mid-range-DSLR-iBest-pro-C-mid-range-DSLR-iBest-fullframe-camera-image
Best-Camera-of-2016-button-

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 40 other subscribers